· 1 min read

Vendor Management Playbook: Contracts, SLAs, and Accountability

Vendor relationships fail when expectations stay polite. Build a playbook that prices risk and rewards clarity.

Vendor relationships fail when expectations stay polite. Build a playbook that prices risk and rewards clarity.

Vendors rarely wake up wanting to underperform. They respond to the incentives you set and the clarity you provide. A playbook stops the drift.

Problem: paper without behavior

  • Contracts describe deliverables but ignore how decisions are made.
  • SLAs measure uptime, not delivery predictability.
  • Accountability is a meeting, not a consequence.

Solution: four plays

  1. Performance currency: Pay on capability delivered, quality gates passed, and decision latency reduced—not hours burned.
  2. SLA portfolio: Track uptime, defect escape rate, backlog churn, and change success rate. Publish weekly so excuses die fast.
  3. Escalation muscle: Pre-agree on a 48-hour escalation ladder with named contacts and the authority they hold. Use it before crises, not after.
  4. Runway visibility: Map dependencies and renewal dates together. A vendor without future visibility will hedge and slow-roll.

Smart conclusions

  • Make the joint backlog public; secrecy breeds padding.
  • Tie contract extensions to measurable improvements in cycle time and incident response.
  • If you cannot see the vendor’s decision tree, you are the dependency, not the client.
Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »